Scientific problems with radiometric dating

We often test them under controlled conditions to learn when and why they fail so we will not use them incorrectly. For example, after extensive testing over many years, it was concluded that uranium-helium dating is highly unreliable because the small helium atom diffuses easily out of minerals over geologic time.As a result, this method is not used except in rare and highly specialized applications.

These methods provide valuable and valid age data in most instances, although there is a small percentage of cases in which even these generally reliable methods yield incorrect results.I could have selected many more examples but then this would have turned into a book rather than the intended short paper.The Manson Meteorite Impact and the Pierre Shale In the Cretaceous Period, a large meteorite struck the earth at a location near the present town of Manson, Iowa.The heat of the impact melted some of the feldspar crystals in the granitic rocks of the impact zone, thereby resetting their internal radiometric clocks.These melted crystals, and therefore the impact, have been dated by the 40Ar/39Ar method at 74.1 Ma (million years; Izett and others 1998), but that is not the whole story by a long shot.

Search for scientific problems with radiometric dating:

scientific problems with radiometric dating-7scientific problems with radiometric dating-72scientific problems with radiometric dating-19scientific problems with radiometric dating-7

The results of the Manson Impact/Pierre Shale dating study (Izett and others 1998) are shown in Figure 1.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “scientific problems with radiometric dating”